Electronic Vulnerability

GMO Danger: CALEA II (Government Modified Operating system)

By Luther Weeks on May 19, 2013

Last week a group of computer security experts issued a warning about a proposed expansion of government spying know as CALEA II (Communications Assistance For Law Enforcement Assistance) being considered for “wire” tap expansion.

The report if anything understates the risks. Further, if you believe that, in general, government can be incompetent, that makes this plan even less effective and more risky.

Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, National | Leave a response

Testimony against six bills and for one

By Luther Weeks on March 12, 2013

All of these bills are well intended. In fact, I would support most of the concepts, yet in only a single case could I support one of these bills , based on huge gaps between the good intent and the actual details present and missing in those bills.

Posted in Chain of Custody, Electronic Vulnerability, Legislature2013, Post-Election Audits | Leave a response

What We Worry? What Could Go Wrong On Election Day?

By Luther Weeks on November 3, 2012

America’s elections are run entirely on the honor system. What could possibly go wrong?

Posted in CT, Electronic Vulnerability, Internet Voting, Mail/Absentee Voting, National, National Popular Vote, Post-Election Audits, Recounts/Recanvasses | Leave a response

Caltech/MIT: What has changed, what hasn’t, & what needs improvement

By Luther Weeks on October 25, 2012

The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project has released a thorough, comprehensive, and insightful new report timed to the 2012 election. We find little to quibble with in the report. We agree with all of its recommendations.Several items with which we fully endorse were covered in this report which sometimes are missing from the discussion or often underemphasised.

The report itself is 52 pages, followed by 32 pages of opinions of others, including election officials, advocates, and vendors, some of whom disagree with some aspects of the report. Every page is worth reading. The report is not technical. It covers a wide range of issues, background, and recommendations.

Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, Internet Voting, Mail/Absentee Voting, National, National Popular Vote, Post-Election Audits, Reports | Leave a response

CTVotersCount flip flops from “Trust but Verify” to “Verify to Trust”

By Luther Weeks on October 20, 2012

There is absolutely no need to “trust” anyone if there is sufficient verification. There is also little evidence to trust our democracy to anyone. As they say power corrupts.

Now we learn that many of our votes are being counted by machines under the influence of one of the candidates and his family.

Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, National | Leave a response

Big Bird and Charlie Rose know what the CT Legislature does not!

By Luther Weeks on October 6, 2012

See Charlie Rose interview Dr. Barbara Simons, co-auther of Broken Ballots. <view >

Big Bird and Charlie Rose now know that Internet voting, email voting, Virgina elections, and inadequately audited elections – do not merit our trust.

Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, Internet Voting, Legislature2012, National | Leave a response

What can the F.D.A. teach us about Officials, Internet voting, and Computer voting?

By Luther Weeks on July 16, 2012

Vast, easy spying capabilities. No technical expertise required. The possibilities are endless. Votes, voters, spouses, lawyers, business opponents, employees, bosses, officials, candidates, campaigns, investigators, and auditors can be monitored by practically anyone. Will the perpetrators be brought to justice?

Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, Internet Voting, National | Leave a response

UConn paper warns of limitations of cryptography

By Luther Weeks on June 13, 2012

Use of good tools must go hand-in-hand with good use of tools

Posted in CT, Electronic Vulnerability, National, Reports | Leave a response

Newspapers join CTVotersCount, ACLU, and CBIA in objections to H.B. 5556

By Luther Weeks on June 1, 2012

CTVotersCount opposes H.B. 5556 and has urged Governor Malloy to veto the bill because it contains a provision for risky, unconstitutional email and fax voting.

Posted in CT Law, Electronic Vulnerability, Internet Voting, Legislature2012 | Leave a response

Could It Happen Here? Too wide to scan, would we count or copy?

By Luther Weeks on April 5, 2012

Brad Blog reports ballots too wide to scan in Wisconsin. The official solution – count by hand? NO. They copied the ballots and scanned. We agree with Brad that this is unacceptable. But what would happen in Connecticut – would one of our warnings come true?

Posted in CT, CT Law, Electronic Vulnerability | Leave a response

Page 10 of 24« First «...8 91011 12...20...»Last »