Skip to content

CTVotersCount.org

CTNewsJunkie: 10 Towns Consolidate, Move Polling Locations

CTNewsJunkie article <read>

CTNewsJunkie article <read>

Author Luther WeeksPosted on November 8, 2011Categories CT

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Senator not impressed by Science and Online Voting Symposium

Next Next post: Beware: Americans Elect – We were just too optimistic

Follow Us

News

.RecentlyUpdated

06/27 Bridgeport criminals not enough to pass election reforms
05/29 Judge: Voting more valuable then money
03/18 New Oklahoma School Curriculum Requires Students to Learn “The Big Lie”
02/18 The Trump Administration Is Going After Our Elections Too
.More News

About, Background
CTVotersCount Index

About CTVotersCount.org
Concerns with CT law
Editorial/Comment Policy
Frequently Asked Questions
From Levers to Op-Scan
Petition 2009
Reading List
Ten Nutmeg State Myths
You Can Take Action

Chain of Custody
Common Sense
Costs
CT Law
Editorials, CTVotersCount
Editorials, Others
Electronic Vulnerability
Errors/Skulduggery
Errors/Skulduggery, CT
Instant Runoff Voting
Internet Security
Internet Voting
Mail/Absentee Voting
National Popular Vote
NonScienceNonsense
Post-Election Audits
Recounts/Recanvasses
Reports

CT Links
National Links
Reports

Citizen Audit Reports
CT Election Statutes
CT Elections Enforcement Commission
CT General Assembly
CT Regulations
CT Secretary of the State, Elections
CTNewsWire
How to Vote Demos
Open Connecticut
PA 07-194, CT Audit Law
UConn Reports

BlackBoxVoting.org
BradBlog.com
Election Law Blog
Excellence in Administration
GovTrack (Find U.S. Bills)
InstantRunoffVoting.us
NoVoteByMail
Overseas Vote Foundation
Presidential Commission 2013
Technologists' Statement On Internet Voting
VerifiedVoting.org
VotingNews

2012 Election Technology Preparedness
American Voting Experience
Audit Principles & Best Practices
Auditing Recommendations, LWV
Brennan: Election Integrity Agenda
Brennan: Machinery Of Democracy
Brennan: Post-Election Audits
CA Stds Working Group
CA Top To Bottom
Caltech/MIT: What has changed, what hasn't, & what needs improvement
Election Audit Bibliography
Elections Admin Research DB
Evidence Based Elections
Ohio Everest Reports
Outsourcing Elections
Recounut Principles & Best Practices
Risk Limiting Audits, White Paper
Risk Limiting Audits: A Guide for Global Use
Risk Limiting Audits: Why and How
Risk-Limiting Audits, A Gentle Introduction
SAFE Auditing
The Price of Voting: Today's Voting Machine Marketplace
U WI: Early voting decreases turnout
US Vote Foundation: Internet voting study
Verified Voting’s Policy on DREs and BMDs
Video: How One Town Counts Ballots In NH
Video: Hursti Hack
Voter reg databases, ACM
What Hath HAVA Wrought?

This Week Past Years

2019

Common Sense: Justified Confidence
How Democracy Lost In NYC

2018

VoteAllegheny Analysis of Election Risks in One County

2017

Response to ill-advised Presidential Commission risks democracy

2015

Top security official, spouts NonScience Nonsense

2014

Ignore this post - it is based on facts and reason.

2013

Common Sense: Why should audits be Independent?

2012

Another 4th of July Suggestion

2011

Round-Up: O Me O My O - Errors in Jersey and Fraud in Ohio
Audit Report: Flawed by lack of transparency, incomplete data, and assumed accuracy

2010

Internet Voting Called Unfair, Not Observable, and Not Transparent
What Do YOU [still] Want?
New York: Leveling the playing field for mail-in voting?
Unsafe at any cost - Internet voting

2009

Mark Ritchie: A recount to make Minnesota proud
Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Voting

2008

Update: Bysiewicz, Blumenthal Violate Federal Ban
French Study: More Errors With Electronic Voting
FAQ: Why Bother Auditing Referendums & Questions?
Panel In Fairfield - What Do You Want?
Video: "Vote By Mail" In Zimbabwe

CTVotersCount.org Proudly powered by WordPress