Skip to content

CTVotersCount.org

CTVotersCount.org

Warning!

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Author Luther WeeksPosted on August 10, 2025August 20, 2025Categories CT, National

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: New report faults post-election audits in swing states
Next Next post: Ballot access dispute in CT

Follow Us

FacebookFacebook

News

.RecentlyUpdated
  • 10/09 Dominion Voting Systems Sold to Republican
  • 09/29 SOTS Thomas: CT laws are stronger after Bridgeport problems
  • 09/27 A new challenge to SOTS interpretation of ballot secrecy
  • 09/09 FOI Commission blinks on ballot access
  • 08/12 CT elections panel fines Waterbury man $5,800 over falsified campaign contribution cards
  • .More News
  • About, Background
  • CTVotersCount Index
  • About CTVotersCount.org
  • Concerns with CT law
  • Editorial/Comment Policy
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • From Levers to Op-Scan
  • Petition 2009
  • Reading List
  • Ten Nutmeg State Myths
  • You Can Take Action
  • Chain of Custody
  • Common Sense
  • Costs
  • CT Law
  • Editorials, CTVotersCount
  • Editorials, Others
  • Electronic Vulnerability
  • Errors/Skulduggery
  • Errors/Skulduggery, CT
  • Instant Runoff Voting
  • Internet Security
  • Internet Voting
  • Mail/Absentee Voting
  • National Popular Vote
  • NonScienceNonsense
  • Post-Election Audits
  • Recounts/Recanvasses
  • Reports
  • CT Links
  • National Links
  • Reports
  • Citizen Audit Reports
  • CT Election Statutes
  • CT Elections Enforcement Commission
  • CT General Assembly
  • CT Regulations
  • CT Secretary of the State, Elections
  • CTNewsWire
  • How to Vote Demos
  • Open Connecticut
  • PA 07-194, CT Audit Law
  • UConn Reports
  • BlackBoxVoting.org
  • BradBlog.com
  • Election Law Blog
  • Excellence in Administration
  • GovTrack (Find U.S. Bills)
  • InstantRunoffVoting.us
  • NoVoteByMail
  • Overseas Vote Foundation
  • Presidential Commission 2013
  • Technologists' Statement On Internet Voting
  • VerifiedVoting.org
  • VotingNews
  • 2012 Election Technology Preparedness
  • American Voting Experience
  • Audit Principles & Best Practices
  • Auditing Recommendations, LWV
  • Brennan: Election Integrity Agenda
  • Brennan: Machinery Of Democracy
  • Brennan: Post-Election Audits
  • CA Stds Working Group
  • CA Top To Bottom
  • Caltech/MIT: What has changed, what hasn't, & what needs improvement
  • Election Audit Bibliography
  • Elections Admin Research DB
  • Evidence Based Elections
  • Ohio Everest Reports
  • Outsourcing Elections
  • Recounut Principles & Best Practices
  • Risk Limiting Audits, White Paper
  • Risk Limiting Audits: A Guide for Global Use
  • Risk Limiting Audits: Why and How
  • Risk-Limiting Audits, A Gentle Introduction
  • SAFE Auditing
  • The Price of Voting: Today's Voting Machine Marketplace
  • U WI: Early voting decreases turnout
  • US Vote Foundation: Internet voting study
  • Verified Voting’s Policy on DREs and BMDs
  • Video: How One Town Counts Ballots In NH
  • Video: Hursti Hack
  • Voter reg databases, ACM
  • What Hath HAVA Wrought?

This Week Past Years

2022

  • Hand counting alone not the solution to election integrity

2019

  • John Oliver on election integrity

2018

  • Connecticut dodges EDR bullet. How long will EDR dodge the Civil Rights bullet?
  • Georgia voter registration system crisis touches Connecticut

2017

  • Samantha Bee: The Matrix has your vote

2016

  • Another Annotation: Don't stop being concerned about election integrity.
  • Maryland My Maryland: The only problem is the $275,000 "audit" won't work.

2015

  • No transparent recount; No public access to ballots; No confidence
  • It's a Conspiracy Theory, until it is not a Theory - Voting Party Edition

2014

  • Election Wrap-Up: Got one right, one wrong, and "Who Could Have Imagined"
  • Final Warning: Don't say "Who could have imagined?"

2013

  • Speed Up Election Results - Not so fast, with another half-baked solution

2012

  • What We Worry? What Could Go Wrong On Election Day?

2011

  • Tuesday election is on. Your polling place may move.
  • Governor Extends Voter Registration Deadline via Executive Order

2010

  • Connecticut Governor Race: Integrity Issues
  • If we can bank by ATM, why not vote by the Internet?

2009

  • A Day As Absentee Ballot Moderator
  • Secretary of the State's Letter To Senator Schumer RE: Premier, ES&S
  • Statisticians, Political Scientists, Election Officials, and Advocates Recommendations to NIST

2008

  • CT: Courant: "How Stupid Is This?"
  • CT: City Hall scene of election day dispute
  • CT: Historic: Third Party Registrar Elected In Hartford
  • CT: Glitches In ConnPost Article
  • CT: A Long Valuable Day As An Election Official
  • CT: Voter Reg System Said To Be Working Well
  • Video: Hacking Voting Machine in 6min 51sec

2007

  • Take Action - Be A Post-Election Audit Observer
  • Fox News iTeam: Cuyahoga County Diebold E-Voting Machines
  • 14 Towns Exempt From Post-Election Audits, So Far
  • Bysiewicz Trashes Levers - Minimizes Vulnerabilities
  • Talk Radio Investigation Into New Voting Technology Reveals Vulnerabilities
  • Memory Card Failures 1%? 4%? 9%? - Diebold Won't Disclose Data
CTVotersCount.org Proudly powered by WordPress