DemocracyNow! Interviews New York Times Author

<read, listen, view> More scary and devastating than reading the article in the New York Times Magazine.

Still does not fully address the similar issues of optical scan which are only solved with sufficient post-election audits. Yes, recounts of the paper from optical scan is vary reassuring, yet recounts are seldom done, even in cases of important suspicions, like the recent New Hampshire Primary. Precisely why we need post-election audits.

This interview does more fully cover the issues of outsourcing.


Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.